Eredeti melléklet letöltése
(PDF file)

Ez a közérdekűadat-igénylés csatolmányának HTML formátumú változata 'Önkormányzati INGATLANOK - 10 év'.



Feedback for Applicants
 
1/6
20. 03. 2025

Feedback for Applicants
Feedback report - European City Facility
Application number
07HU001807R
Title of proposed
Geothermal Energy Utilization for Sustainable Public Building
investment concept
Operations in Nagymaros
Name of the
municipality/local
authority, grouping, or
local public entity
Nagymaros Város Önkormányzata
aggregating
municipalities/local
authorities
Organization
Nagymarosi Polgármesteri Hivatal
Evaluation result
TOTAL SCORE
13.43 / 20
SCORE PER EVALUATION CRITERION
1. Ambition of the proposed investment
2.8 / 7
project
2. Governance structure for investment
3.8 / 5
concept development
3. Stakeholder engagement strategy
4.3 / 5
4. Coherence and plausibility
2.6 / 3
Overall feedback on the evaluation
Overall, the application addresses the EUCF criteria in an adequate manner. The aim of
the proposed investment concept is geothermal energy utilisation for sustainable public
building operations in the municipality. The application performs well in regard to the
proposed governance structure and stakeholder engagement strategy, with potential for
improvement in addressing further relevant aspects in the descriptions. The proposed
investment project is less ambitious in relation to the other applications submitted in the
regional call. The two mandatory supporting documents for the EUCF application were
successfully submitted. More detailed feedback per evaluation criterion and on the
submitted documents can be found below.
 
2/6
20. 03. 2025

Feedback for Applicants
Evaluation results per criterion
1. Ambition of the proposed investment project
SCORE:
Following aspects are considered in the evaluation:
 
 
2.8 / 7
o Ambition of the expected absolute investment size (EUR)
 
o Ambition of the expected investment per capita (EUR/inhabitant)
Threshold 3.5/7
o Ambition of the expected impacts in energy savings (GWh/y) and
renewable energy generation (GWh/y)
o Ambition of the figures per capita of the expected impacts in energy
savings (GWh/y/inhabitant) and renewable energy generation (GWh/y)
o Cost-effectiveness of the project
o Focus on energy efficiency measures and impacts in energy savings
o Potential for replication and/or up-scaling of the proposed investment
project.
The proposed investment project is less ambitious in relation to the
other submitted application in the regional call and to the local context,
with lower investment size and impacts in terms of energy savings and
renewable energy production. The proposed investment project includes
1. FEEDBACK
substantial energy efficiency measures and impacts in energy savings,
but these do not correspond to the majority of the foreseen impacts. The
project demonstrates potential to be replicated and/or up-scaled in the
region and/or in different contexts. The replication/up-scaling potential
is very well addressed by the applicant.
2. Governance structure for development of the investment concept
SCORE:
Following aspects are considered in the evaluation:
 
 
3.8 / 5
o Clearly defined roles and responsibilities of the different actors
 
involved
Threshold 2.5/5
o Clearly defined decision-making processes, indicating actors with
decision-making power
o Appointment of person(s) in charge for the development of the
investment concept
o Good understanding whether internal capacities are sufficient for the
successful development of an investment concept
o Good understanding of how external experts can be involved in the
process to provide value-added and/or build capacities.
o Appropriate and robust internal organisational structure for the
development of the investment concept
o Overall coherence and plausibility of the elements.
 
3/6
20. 03. 2025

Feedback for Applicants
The application addresses criterion governance structure well. The
proposed organisational structure seems robust and appropriate for the
development of the investment concept. Elements such as the roles and
2. FEEDBACK
responsibilities of the actors involved and decision-making processes as
well as internal capacities for the development of the investment
concept and the need for external experts. More information could have
been provided on persons in charge for the investment concept.
3. Stakeholder engagement strategy
SCORE:
Following aspects are considered in the evaluation:
 
 
4.3 / 5
o Clear definition of important stakeholders for the investment project
 
o Good understanding of the needs and expectations of the identified
Threshold 2.5/5
stakeholders towards the planned investment project
o Clear definition of planned activities for fostering stakeholder
engagement
o Foreseen communication instruments to reach the different
stakeholders
o Timing of implementation of planned engagement activities
o Appropriate strategy to involve identified stakeholders in the
investment concept development
o Overall coherence and plausibility
Criterion stakeholder engagement strategy is well addressed in the
application. The strategy for stakeholder engagement is coherent and
adequate for the development of the investment concept. Elements such
as the definition of important stakeholders and the identification of their
3. FEEDBACK
needs and expectations towards the investment project are well
addressed in the application as well as planned engagement activities
and foreseen communication instruments. More information could have
been provided on the overall timeline for implementation of the
envisaged engagement strategy.
4. Coherence and plausibility
SCORE:
Following aspects are considered in the evaluation:
 
 
2.6 / 3
o Completeness of the information provided in the application form
 
o Coherence and plausibility of the information provided in the
Threshold 1.5/3
application form
o Coherence and reasonability of the expected investment size
o Coherence and reasonability of the expected
 
4/6
20. 03. 2025

Feedback for Applicants
The application is complete and the information provided about the
proposed investment project is coherent and plausible, but could provide
more detailed information about the proposed investment project.This
project aims at replacing fossil fuel-based systems with geothermal
4. FEEDBACK
energy, demonstrating a focus on renewable energy production. It is not
clear how the expected impacts in energy savings will be achieved. The
impacts in energy savings and renewable energy production seem to
have been double counted in the application.
 
5/6
20. 03. 2025

Feedback for Applicants
Political commitments
1. Commitment to mitigation targets
Following aspects are verified:
 
o Submission of a Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan (SECAP) or other local
climate/energy plan with mitigation targets;
o General information about the submitted plan in the application form: title, time period
covered, brief description and URL, if available.
o Mitigation targets established by the plan, including the target value and unit, the target
year and corresponding page of the plan where the target is addressed.
2. Political commitment to the development of the investment concept
Following aspects are verified:
 
o Submission of letter of support signed by the Mayor or other relevant political
representative of the municipality/local authority, grouping or local public entity
aggregating municipalities/local authorities;
o Use of the template provided by the EUCF for the submission of the letter of support;
 
6/6
20. 03. 2025